Archive for the ‘innovation’ Category

 
Comments (0) 07.26.2011
Share |

Military Crosswalk .jobs

Tuesday, July 26th, 2011

For years companies have tried hiring freshly transitioned military veterans although found a high-level of difficulty cracking the code of military identifiers and how those identifiers relate to their open positions.

After implementing Veterans.jobs and MilitaryFamily.jobs, I was approached by Carrie Corbin from AT&T, a DirectEmployers member company, and asked if we could adapt the Veterans.jobs Military Crosswalk technology to fit AT&T’s specific veteran hiring needs.

Today DirectEmployers Association is providing companies with a corporate branded solution which helps crack this very difficult code and aid in the identification of qualified candidates. This answer is in the form of a company specific Military Jobs Crosswalk platform powered by the DotJobs Universe. This innovative platform automatically provides a simple translation or “crosswalk” interface which allows service men and women preparing to transition into civilian life the opportunity to use their current Military Occupation Code (MOC) to easily find civilian jobs on corporate sites.

For Example:
(Army) 25B = Information Technology Specialist (Civilian)
(Navy) 0904 = Critical Care Nurse (Civilian)
(Marines) 1310 = Civil Engineer (Civilian)
(Air Force) 3D032 = Network Administrator (Civilian)
(Coast Guard) 91 = Physician (Civilian)

Every platform is flexible and manageable by the hiring company allowing addition or change of branding, video content, talent community interface, or possibly just plain text thanking our service members and inviting them to join their company’s ranks.

Military Crosswalk PILOT companies:
ATT-Veterans.jobs (AT&T)
Providence-Veterans.jobs (Providence Health & Services)
Camber-Veterans.jobs (Camber Corporation)
ConocoPhillips-Veterans.jobs (ConocoPhillips)

This is not the answer to every military hiring ill for a company although it provides the cornerstone all companies need to start communicating effectively with our military men and women who are transitioning into civilian life daily and wanting to explore an exciting new life and career.

Would your company like a .jobs Military Crosswalk?
Military Crosswalk .jobs information

 
Comments (0) 12.22.2010
Share |

Fix Flawed Internet Process, Weddle Says

Wednesday, December 22nd, 2010

My boss Bill Warren is a hilarious cat who has been in the online recruitment space longer than ANYONE (it’s a fact). Seriously, right after Todd at ERE wrote the “Fix Flawed Dot-jobs Process, Weddle Says” post in October Bill wrote this hilarious parody and sent it out to the staff here at DirectEmployers.

It’s amazing what experience and just basic common sense allows a person to see.

Enjoy,
Chad

*******************
Peter,

I’m glad you and your cronies weren’t around to “protect” newspapers when we launched Online Career Center in 1992. It’s ironic that the .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition consists of the same folks who danced on the graves of newspapers when the Internet was coming to fruition.

Your pal,
Bill Warren

Here is what Todd Raphael’s column would have looked like in 1992:

ERE News and Features
Fix Flawed Internet Process, Weddle Says

By: Todd Raphael

Oct 26, 1992, 4:13 pm ET

IAEWS Peter Weddle a recruiter-consultant-author who heads up an association of people who run newspapers said today that the “process was flawed” — a reference to the ongoing saga of the Internet. He announced that the body that regulates the Internet is part way through a period in which it’s reconsidering its recent decision to take an expansive view of how the Internet can be used.

Speaking here in Hollywood, Florida at a meeting, Weddle said he has high regard for the organizations on the other side of this issue but that he and his allies such as the Newspaper Association of America, the American Society of Association Executives, and the American Staffing Association believe “this whole exercise is flawed.”

In his conference session — “The Truth About the Internet Affair” — Weddle said the following are myths about the proposal to expand the Internet beyond its original use, which was to be used only for email:

• “This is good for employers.” If that’s true, Weddle asks, why is the U.S. Chamber of Commerce opposed to it? (Without mentioning that the 350,000 member world-wide HR sponsoring association conducted an extensive Council review and a valid survey in which the Internet expansion was overwhelmingly approved by employers).

• “This is good for veterans.” But, he says lining up against the proposal is the Veterans of Foreign Wars, and other military hiring organizations. (Without mentioning that the VFW minimally sponsors Vetjobs.com and other Military hiring organizations are for it).

• “This won’t violate trademarks.” Weddle says the European Trademark Owners Association opposes the proposal. Weddle gives an example also of NativeAmericanJobs, a small newspaper that he says has spent a decade building its brand. In the last four or five months it has begun to be confused with the new NativeAmerican, which is an entirely different newspaper.

• “This is just a U.S. issue.” Weddle notes that non-U.S. newspapers and newspapers in China, Japan, Australia, and Europe are all opposed.

• “This is only a problem for for-profit companies.” Weddle says non-profits are all on his side.

• “This is an issue for niche newspapers that can’t compete.“ The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Tribune, and Los Angeles Times are all opposed”, he says.

Weddle announced that the Internet Governance Committee is midway through a 90-day window in which it’s reconsidering its decision. He argues: 1) The Internet shouldn’t be used for purposes that were never intended, and that the original charter was for the Internet to be used for email only; 2) The process thus far offers little hope that future expansion will be fair; 3) And, as mentioned, trademark rights aren’t being respected.

The Internet Governance Committee could change its mind during its reconsideration period. Or, it could merely announce that it’s thinking of changing its mind, and open the decision back up for further review. (There is one other option which I don’t dare mention).

*******************
ROTFL, that’s just good clean fun ;o)

 
Comments (0) 09.22.2010
Share |

Silver Bullet

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

You are in search for the killer app, the mythical recruiting silver bullet, an online recruiting one shot one hire solution although you know, in the real world, a broad strategy is the answer, moreover the ability to create fluid relationships between our technologies and platforms resulting in hiring date is the real topic.

One recruiting answer is never the recruiting answer, quite the contrary really. Hiring companies who use technology to dynamically weave many VERIFIED initiatives into their process and collect analytics and hiring data is the key.

BUT… you don’t have the budget to buy everything so you NEED the analytics to help verify “WHAT ACTUALLY WORKS“, which is why streamlining job seeker traffic through a central analytics system is a MUST.

How can you make a DECISION if you don’t have the DATA?

Mobile… SEO… Twitter… Facebook… Syndication… by themselves are merely flash with little BANG, although intertwined and connected with analytics and hiring data provides the real key. Don’t settle for FLASH when you need HIRES. So think twice when approached by a vendor bringing you a bag tricks without the ability to produce companies who can testify with hiring data.

In the end you need a combat load of silver bullets not merely one in the pipe.

Combat load od Silver bullets

 
Comments (0) 07.15.2010
Share |

DirectEmployers Responds

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

**MEMBER UPDATE**

DirectEmployers Association is a nonprofit HR consortium of leading global employers formed to improve labor market efficiency through the sharing of best practices, research and the development of technology.

To be clear, DirectEmployers Association is a member of SHRM, IAEWS, and the .jobs community. As a member in good standing of IAEWS, I would like to submit my formal complaint for the public record to the premeditated tactics and strategies used by the IAEWS organization to not only outright pollute and discredit this ICANN public comment forum but also Employ Media, the .jobs sTLD, and SHRM.

We have performed considerable due diligence with regards to Employ Media’s proposed amendment, the work of the .jobs PDP Council, the involvement by SHRM managing the PDP process, and the RSEP document as set forth by Employ Media to ICANN. We urge the ICANN staff and Board to appreciate what we have to say in this correspondence is coming from a position of knowledge and education based substantively upon the available documents published by SHRM and Employ Media enabling anyone else to do same.

First, we wish to communicate that the overwhelming majority of opposing comments – and we’ve reviewed each – clearly indicate no review of the substantial body of work that comprises the RSEP submission by Employ Media. Further, we feel it is likely that most stating opposition is unaware of the existence of this body of work, a point we will come back to later. At a high level, DirectEmployers Association is calling into question the worthiness and/or value – to anyone – of what we consider the bulk of the comments that have not reviewed the relevant and pertinent documents that comprise Employ Media’s RSEP towards the goal of an informed opinion of benefit to all.

This ICANN venue, this very RSEP process, is a culmination of substantial and credible community due diligence led by SHRM, well documented for public view. DirectEmployers Association proposed to Employ Media a beta test to gather real market data to determine if names that are not company names would in fact serve needs of the HR community as the .jobs Charter requires. Its indeed the credible evidence produced along the way to serve needs of the community, that has led to this RSEP submission, that has caused those feeling threatened to launch an outright discrediting campaign against the principals, primarily SHRM and Employ Media.

As the policy delegate to .jobs, SHRM managed a policy development process to arrive at a bottom up, consensus recommendation in the interests of the specific community .jobs exists to serve. Outreach as part of this included public discussions, scientific surveying, and focus groups. The end result, by super majority of the Council, was to recommend Employ Media’s proposed amendment to allocate names that are not company names. The scope of this recommendation was Council’s determination, based upon the results of its outreach, that needs of the community would be served, exactly as the .jobs Charter requires.

Some feeling threatened by what the evidence has produced, and/or unhappy a policy recommendation did not go their way, want to conveniently ignore the substantial due diligence that has led to this point, being the RSEP process. What have been appalling are the methods devised by IAEWS to spread what is nothing less than a smear campaign using modern day technology such as e-mail, blogs, and twitter, to mobilize as many people as possible to complete one action – submit a chain letter of opposition to this forum. The blatancy of this as a premeditated strategy is clear by the fact that they don’t even try to hide it, and in fact are seemingly proud of it. This is nothing less than an embarrassment to the HR community in the eyes of the ICANN community and those that follow it.

The smear campaign as led by IAEWS has had at least one public call for additional funding. So clearly this is a funded campaign. The law firm that IAEWS has retained is the same law firm representing the .xxx TLD application, and likely the same partner. It is not a coincidence that the same chain letter tactics and spread of disinformation that have been used in those public comment venues have shown up in the .jobs RSEP public comment venue. But there is a big difference: This is an ICANN RSEP venue, not a bottom up policy public comment venue. ICANN should recognize this difference even if those that do not care do not. The law firm seems to clearly have advised IAEWS to Astroturf this forum rather than provide the pertinent RSEP material to those they want to mobilize towards the ability to make an informed comment.

DirectEmployers Association, representing employer interests beyond just its members as required by our own by-laws, supports ICANN approval of Employ Media’s RSEP in the interests of employers.

Sincerely,

Bill Warren
Executive Director
DirectEmployers Association

 
Comments (0) 06.09.2010
Share |

Innovation Step 1

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

“Step 1: Get out of the fetal position!”

I am asked on occasion why companies talk feverishly about innovation but hardly ever (if ever) put solid innovation schemes into play.

FEAR is my answer. Pick whatever flavor you like:

Fear of failure
Fear of loss of standing
Fear of risk
Fear of conflict

and the list goes on…

The fear I’ve seen lately is fear of progress. Obviously progress is NOT bad, quite the contrary, although progress may impact current revenue structures and business models dramatically. But isn’t that what innovation does? It disrupts! It drives change! This means once a company finds their “innovation sweet spot” they need to start researching and developing another one immediately, even if (especially if) it threatens their current business model.

Case in point: Blockbuster versus Netflix
Netflix not only blew Blockbuster’s long standing and market leading movie rental business model out of the water, they continued researching technology to find exactly what would blow their DVD-by-mail model out of the water in the coming years and then ADOPTED IT! The lesson here is not to ignore or block the inevitable innovation, rather embrace it and turn it into a winner for yourself before a competitor does.

Many companies have tried and failed throughout the years in the online recruiting industry and their efforts should be remembered and celebrated. They were strong enough to try and fail where many others are still laying in the fetal position hoping nothing changes or doing everything in their power to block or stop progress because of FEAR.

Don’t go through life scared, get out of the fetal position and innovate!

Suggested & related reading:
- INNOVATE or DIE!
- Knock 3 times, for INNOVATION
- Caroline’s Innovation Questions
- The Fear of Innovation – Phil McKinney
- To increase innovation, reduce fear – Andrew Papageorge
- Innovation and change: What are you afraid of? – Mark Swiecichowsk