the CHAD
the CHAD
the CHAD
the CHAD
the CHAD
the CHAD

Archive for the 'search engines' Category

Who benefits from Google and Indeed?

I’ve had a question running around in my head for well over a year now… What job sites use Google as their core traffic provider? So I thought I’d take some time perform some research, using Hitwise, and then it prompted yet another question… What job sites use Indeed as their core traffic provider?

So I took some time and gathered the following one week worth of data from Hitwise (week ending 3/8/2008) and thought I’d share… ENJOY!

Google provides:
80% of JobSearchUSA’s traffic
79% of JuJu’s traffic
73% of Jobs.net’s traffic - (CareerBuilder feeder)
61% of JobBankUSA’s traffic
50% of Flipdog’s traffic (Monster feeder)
48% of DiversityJobs.com’s traffic
46% of Simplyhired’s traffic
27% of Medzilla’s traffic and last but not least…
23% of Indeed’s traffic is provided by Google.

Indeed provides:
60% of JobKite’s traffic
57% of Jobkabob’s traffic
50% of AJE’s traffic
43% of FederalGovernmentJobs.us’s traffic
38% of AllRetailJobs.com’s traffic
35% of HospitalJobsOnline’s traffic
34% of Beyond.com’s traffic
26% of JobsInLogistics‘ traffic
21% of Dice’s traffic and
21% of ComputerJobs.com’s

I also found this to be notable: TopJobsUSA receives 24% of their traffic from Google and 25% traffic from Job.com.

Stepping back and taking a look at the big picture Google provides 12% of the traffic to the entire Employment & Training Category and Indeed provides 5%, which is actually pretty amazing.

Pretty incredible, although who are the winners and who are the losers in this scenario? Can recruiting be done more efficiently in today’s market by leveraging less, albeit more powerful properties? If some job sites are not diversifying their traffic wouldn’t it be easier for hiring companies to go straight to the prime source of the traffic instead of a middle man (ummm.. errrrr) person?

The message:
Grow, evolve, and diversify before it’s too late…

Job Board Penetration in Europe II

I wanted to follow-up my April “Job Board Penetration in Europe” post with some fresh, and not so fresh, names and numbers.

So here it goes….

In today’s online labor market, total penetration is a must, not just active job seeker penetration. The following sites are the top 5 trafficked career sites in Europe and only hold single digit market share numbers of the total European internet market

Monster - 3.5%
ANPE Sites - 1.2%
JOBCENTREPLUS - 1.2%
Stepstone - 1.2%
Bundesagentur für Arbeit - 1.2%
Source: comScore World Metrix

…while some search engines, Google, MSN, and Yahoo!, own 70 to almost 90% shares of TOTAL MARKET PENETRATION!


Checkout information on internships at Experience.com

Yahoo soars above Google in Japan

GOT GLOBAL REACH?

comScore reports Google and Microsoft continuing to run neck and neck in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Latin America….

… while Yahoo! soars to #1 in Japan and throughout Asia Pacific.

Yahoo! glide past Google

Ask.com, what are they looking for?

The newest comScore search engine stats show Google’s continued choke hold on the search market with a towering 50% share in the United States, while Ask.com is still in the basement. (April-May 07)

Google Sites - 50.7% (3.9 billion searches)
Yahoo! Sites - 26.4% (2 billion searches)
Microsoft Sites - 10.3% (782 million searches)
Ask Network - 5.0% (384 million searches)

But are you asking yourself, umm.. errrr.. posing rather, the same question I am? How can Ask.com be a mere 5% of the U.S. search market after spending loads of cash on talking chimps in pants? - I pray you feel my sarcasm -

Okay so, the “Animals in pants” spots didn’t win over the masses, right.. Well, what about a new slogan everyone will embrace, like “The Algorithm“, and commercials where everyone gets what they are looking for? - enough sarcasm already -

Seriously, I do believe Ask.com users will get what they are looking for when using “The Algorithm”, unfortunately I don’t believe IAC Search & Media will get what they are looking for from this new advertising push…

Wait a minute… They are looking for more market share, aren’t they?

(45 seconds)

Google versus Utah, keywords unlawful?

I know we’ve all been caught up in the “fight drama” lately, but I believe we might’ve missed a real fight which broke earlier this week pitting internet Giant Google against Utah legislation.

The world’s largest Internet search engine says a new state law that curbs keyword-triggered advertising is unconstitutional and probably will be challenged in court. And although the company didn’t promise to be the plaintiff, its spokesman pledged to work with other Internet companies to “educate officials in Utah about the numerous consequences” of the legislation. - The Salt Lake Tribune

I don’t see this going to court, more than likely being found unconstitutional, but it makes for good reading.

The Utah Legislature has earned a name for itself trying to police the electronic frontier, and it isn’t that of Gunsmoke’s Sheriff Matt Dillon, but his often incoherent deputy, Festus. - Scripps News

Festus

Next Page »